Peer review is nicely systematic.
- Students are given one snippet at a time, with all relevant contextual information.
- The feedback is simple but scaffolded around the question of "Does this match the pattern?"
- When a response has received the specified number of reviews, it will be removed, so the spread of feedback is more even than in Wrotevote.
Peer review is good for long snippets
Because students focus on one snippet at a time, Peer Review makes it easier to review multi-paragraph responses.
Its main weakness is it feels like work
While Wrotevote's randomness can mean the results are lopsided and unreliable, it provides an combination of surprise, unpredictability, and social comparison that can be entertaining and motivating.
In comparison, Peer Review is orderly and systematic, but it also feels like an obligation.
We suggest using Peer Review when students are already motivated, and the lesson produces long checkpoint pieces.