Resemblance

Key questions

  • What is this like?

Used for

  • Resolving disputes of classification and identity
  • Similar to a definitional argument except the criteria are for being considered similar to a member of a category
    • This means the criteria can be more flexible and less literal
  • It's about justifying treating something like a member of a different category:
    • "The congestion is like a clump of hair clogging a drain, so we need to pull it out!"
    • "But if we pull it out and don't change the drain, it'll fill up with hair again!"

Heinz ketchup

Makes use of

  • Criteria match reasoning
  • Comparative phrases:
    • is like, are similar to, equivalent to, as if, the same as...

When we don’t get the results we want in our military endeavors, we don’t blame the soldiers. We don’t say, “It’s these lazy soldiers and their bloated benefits plans! That’s why we haven’t done better in Afghanistan!” No, if the results aren’t there, we blame the planners. [...] No one contemplates blaming the men and women fighting every day in the trenches for little pay and scant recognition. And yet in education we do just that. When we don’t like the way our students score on international standardized tests, we blame the teachers.

Other notes

There are two basic types of comparison.

  • Analogy is more poetic and metaphorical:
    • "The streets of downtown Beaverton are liked clogged arteries..."
    • "This proposal will be like putting the city on a low-cholesterol diet..."
  • Precedent is more grounded and literal:
    • "Our traffic is similar to Skunkton's a decade ago..."
    • "This proposal is a watered-down version of what Skunkton did..."

Poverty not a life sentence

Context ideas

  • Speaker roles: Politician, lawyer, advocate, critic, scientist, individual
  • Situations: Cultural, political, or scientific controversy, also personal opportunities and conflicts

FS Resemblance argument polar bear on train

Argue why something in this image is similar to something else. | R1 Introduce issue & make claim | R2 Criterion & match 1 | R3 Criterion & match 2 | R4 Respond to objections | R5 Conclude

Argue why this general trend is similar to another trend. | R1 Introduce issue & make claim | R2 Criterion & match 1 | R3 Criterion & match 2 | R4 Respond to objections | R5 Conclude