Describing daily use

Once people made a pyramid, aqueduct, boat, or vase, how was it used?

That's another kind of process description: art & technology in daily use.

Court lady in kimono Heian period

For example, how did people in Japan use kimonos in different periods of their history?

Kimono from the Heian period

In the Heian period (794-1185), a new technique was developed to make kimonos. In this technique, known as the ‘straight-line-cut’ method, pieces of fabric were cut in straight lines and sewn together. With this technique, kimono makers did not have to concern themselves with the shape of the wearer’s body.

Straight cut kimonos were suitable for all weather conditions: they could be worn in layers to provide warmth in winter, and kimonos made from breathable fabric such as linen were comfortable in summer. Thanks to these advantages, the kimono became part of the everyday life of the Japanese.

In time, when wearing kimonos in layers came into vogue, Japanese began to pay attention to how kimonos of different colours looked together and developed a heightened sensitivity to colour. The colour combinations represented seasonal colours or the political class to which one belonged. It was during this time that what we now regard as traditional Japanese colour combinations developed.

This description tells us about how people used the new straight-cut kimono:

  • How they would layer to wear in different weather conditions
  • How they started to define specific colour combinations and give them meaning

Again we're not describing a specific kimono but describing the way in which people used kimonos at the time.

"Isn't this just describing kimonos in general?"

Sure, the boundaries blur: you can't describe how an art or technology is used without describing some part of the technology itself.

But notice how prominently people and their behaviour feature in this description, compared to earlier descriptions that were more focused on materials and features alone.

Here's another example, describing how Romans actually used their fancy toilets and sewers:

Although the Roman sanitation system was sophisticated among the ancient civilisations, behind the innovation was the reality that disease spread quickly. Even with the public foricae, many Romans simply threw their waste out of the window onto the streets.

Although public officials known as aediles were responsible for keeping the streets clean, in the poorer districts of the city, stepping stones were needed to cross over the piles of rubbish. Eventually, the city’s ground level was raised as buildings were just built on top of rubbish and rubble.

The public baths were also breeding grounds for disease. Roman doctors would often recommend that ill people should go for a cleansing bath. As part of the baths’ etiquette, the sick usually bathed in the afternoons to avoid healthy bathers. However, like public toilets and the streets, there was no daily cleaning routine for keeping the baths themselves clean, so illness was often passed to healthy bathers who visited the next morning.

Romans used a sea sponge on a stick, called a tersorium, to wipe after using the latrine. The sponges were often washed in water containing salt and vinegar, kept in a shallow gutter below the toilets. Yet not everyone carried around their own sponge and public latrines at baths or even the Colosseum would have seen shared sponges, inevitably passing on diseases such as dysentery.

Despite the constant risk of disease, the Romans’ ancient sewer system nonetheless demonstrated innovation and a commitment to public welfare. In fact, it worked so well at transporting waste out of towns and cities that Roman sanitation was replicated across the empire, the echoes of which can still be found today.

From Rome’s Cloaca Maximus that continues to drain the Forum Romanum and surrounding hills, to a well-preserved latrine at Housesteads Fort along Hadrian’s Wall, these remains testify to the innovation behind how the Romans went to the toilet.

This snippet is quite complex. It describes:

  • Behaviour in the toilets.
  • Processes in the city for managing waste.
  • Other physical components needed to make the system work (stepping stones through sewage and vinegar-soaked sponges).
  • The results of this system, which were, to some extent, to make people sick (the Roman sewer system was better than no system, but it wasn't good enough to deal with a million poopers).

How would you describe the use of smartphones in daily life, as a historian 500 years in future?

To help you, here are some phrases from the snippets above:

  • Straight cut kimonos were suitable for...
  • Thanks to these advantages, the kimono became...
  • In time, when wearing kimonos in layers...
  • Although the Roman sanitation system...
  • Even with the public foricae...
  • The public baths were also...
  • However, like public toilets and the streets, there was no...
  • Despite the constant risk of...
Write a 3-5 sentence historical description of the use of smartphones in 21st-century daily life.

Although the use of smartphones in the early 21st century was widespread and revolutionary, they also created certain challenges.

These handheld devices, compact yet powerful, were essential for communication, entertainment, and learning. People used these devices to send instant messages, make voice and video calls, and access social media platforms. Smartphones were also relied upon for navigation, online shopping, and managing personal finances. "Apps" (task-specific programs unlike our general AIs) were central to this experience, providing tools for virtually every aspect of life.

However, the first generations of smartphone users were not well-equipped for the stimulus surplus provided by their devices. It was common for people to sleep with their phones beside them, often checking messages or browsing the internet before falling asleep and immediately upon waking. Many even took their phones to the toilet, only to lose them in tragic and humiliating accidents. It was common for people to walk into obstacles while texting, and many would ignore their friends (but never their enemies) during meals.

Despite these drawbacks, the smartphone became an indispensable tool for the modern individual, embedding itself deeply into the fabric of daily life.