Categories

The lists we've seen so far can be called 'flat' lists, meaning all the items are in the same group and listed at the same level.

Here's another flat list:

The Seven Most Improbably Named Generals of the US Civil War:

C.S. Brig. Gen. States Rights Gist

U.S. Brig. Gen. Zealous B. Tower

U.S. Brig. Gen. Strong Vincent

C.S. Brig. Gen. Eppa Hunton

C.S. Brig. Gen. Bushrod Rust Johnson

U.S. Brig. Gen. Galusha Pennypacker

U.S. Brig. Gen. Jefferson C. Davis

We would say the list is "1 level deep". (We don't count the title as a level.)

Here is the same list, but now organised 2 levels deep. What are the two levels?

The Seven Most Improbably Named Generals of the American Civil War:

Confederate States

- C.S. Brig. Gen. States Rights Gist

- C.S. Brig. Gen. Eppa Hunton

- C.S. Brig. Gen. Bushrod Rust Johnson

United States

- U.S. Brig. Gen. Zealous B. Tower

- U.S. Brig. Gen. Strong Vincent

- U.S. Brig. Gen. Galusha Pennypacker

- U.S. Brig. Gen. Jefferson C. Davis

Do you see how a new type of relationship has been highlighted in this structure?

The list is about improbably named American Civil War generals:

  • Level 1: Which side they were on (Confederate vs United States).
    • Level 2: Names of the generals.

This relationship was always there in the list items, but by grouping the items and then labelling those groups, we make the relationships more clear.

Let's go back to our original idea about listing "things in front of me right now".

Here's a new, expanded version of that list:

Things in front of me right now:

Copy of Animal, Vegetable, Mineral

Case full of cables and hard drives

Cup of coloured pens

Small fabric owl from Kyoto

Unused keep cup

Completed tax form

Index cards covered in notes

Laptop

Screen

Headphones

Orange that looks too dry to be appetising

Set of cards from the game Dialect

Scissors

Tree

Daniele's Patagonia cap

Bag of oats

Ugly mural on the building across the street

Writelike

What other relationships could we find within that group?

What about, "Things I like vs don't like"?

Things in front of me right now:

 

That I like:

-Copy of Animal, Vegetable, Mineral

-Case full of cables and hard drives

-Cup of coloured pens

-Small fabric owl from Kyoto

-Index cards covered in notes

-Laptop

-Screen

-Headphones

-Set of cards from the game Dialect

-Tree

-Bag of oats

 

That I don't like:

-Orange that looks too dry to be appetising

-Ugly mural on the building across the street

 

That I'm neutral about:

-Daniele's Patagonia cap

-Scissors

-Completed tax form

-Unused keep cup

Writelike

What can you tell from this list?

This list is a survey of how I feel about items around me, and the most obvious conclusion is that I am lucky to be surrounded mostly by things I like.

It also forms a portrait of a specific type of working space which has laptops and monitors mixed up with food, colourful pens, trees outside the window.

Also notice this list has three categories.

It could have as many categories as you want. The categories have varying numbers of items, described in varying levels of detail. All those things can change.

What's really important here is the depth of the categories.

In that regard, this is a 2-level list, with categories then items.

You can think of list levels as "how many steps down from the title are the actual list items?"

  • If the list is title + items, then the hierarchy has 1 step (so 1-level, or a 'flat' list).
  • If the list is title + categories + items, then the hierarchy has 2 steps (a 2-level list).
  • If the list is title + categories + subcategories + items, then the hierarchy has 3 steps.
  • And so on.

It's worth spelling this out because if you don't think about levels closely, it's easy.

But if you do think about them, you realise that every list title represents a category, and then you can start to think "Wait, isn't even a flat list a 2-level list? The title is itself a category, so there's 1 step to the items!"

And you'd be right, except that's not the way we tend to describe them, if for no other reason than flat lists look like they only have 1 level.

Write your own list of items around you (aim for 10+), and group them by what you like, don't like, and feel neutral about.

How was that? Pretty easy, right?

Compare your list to other people's, especially if you're all in the same room.

Most likely, there are differences, even if only subtle, in what each person has listed, with what detail they have described each item, and how they have categorised the items.

These differences give you clues about each person's character, point of view, and model of the world.

That's a lot for a simple list!

Let's repeat this activity but increase the complexity by changing the categories we use.