There is a big difference between how an argument is structured and what we actually say to the audience
Everything we've covered here is a very logical, comprehensive way of constructing an argument.
It can help you build a strong foundation for your own argument or explore the foundations of somebody else's argument.
But we don't always show all of this foundational work when we're actually presenting an argument, or show it in the completely logical, hierarchical order that built it.
It's like giving someone a tour through a museum: you don't start in the basement and work your way up to the attic. You choose a route through the museum that will give your guest the best experience.
For instance, this snippet from Empireland isn't organised like any other argument snippet we've seen. but it's clear, logical, and easy to follow: