What did it mean?

Sometimes, we want to recount the facts and only the facts, with no judgment or evaluation. But more often, we need to explain why these facts are worth recounting in the first place.

That means we often want to explain the meaning of past events: 

  • Why was this event significant?
  • What effect did it have at the time?
  • What long-term impacts did it create?
Mongol invasion of Hungary

For example, back in the 1200s, the Mongols, an empire of expert horseriders and archers, rode out of the sea of grass in Central Asia and conquered a big chunk of the continent.

Obviously that vast conquest was dramatic, but what did it mean?

What effect did it have on the world at the time and as time moved on?

Here's a snippet that looks at just one confrontation in that century-long invasion:

On April 11, 1241, Hungarian soldiers lined up along the haphazardly fortified banks of the Hernad and Sajo rivers to await the arrival of the Mongols.

Although the Hungarians’ numbers were vastly superior, the odds were stacked in favor of their opponent. The “Mongol storm” had been raging through Central Asia and Eastern Europe for roughly two decades at this point, swallowing up the Khwarazmian Empire in modern-day Afghanistan, the principalities of Kievan Rus’, and, most recently, the Kingdom of Poland.

Thanks in part to their unrivaled horsemanship and archery skills — Mongolian bows were lighter, faster, and more precise than their European counterparts — the Mongols plowed through armies many times their size, and Hungary proved no exception.

The lines at Sajo and Hernad were breached, cities burned to the ground, crops and livestock confiscated, and an estimated 25% of all Hungarians slaughtered.

The Hungarian king, Béla IV, fled to the Dalmatian coast, which was part of Croatia at the time, where he and his kingdom would have surely been crushed were it not for Ogodei Khan, whose sudden death later that year compelled Mongol forces everywhere to return home to elect a new leader.

The Mongol invasion of Europe, left unfinished, left its mark on the survivors.

“The entire precious kingdom,” the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II wrote of Hungary, “was depopulated, devastated and turned into a barren wasteland.”

The invasion is also believed to have facilitated the spread of the bubonic plague, leading to the deaths of up to 200 million people worldwide.

But while the crimes and casualties of Mongol conquest are too great to count, so, too, are the downstream effects it had on the development of civilization.

Poland, Hungary, and particularly Russia bounced back stronger, building the foundation for nation-states that are still around today.

With the lands of Asia united under a single ruler, ideas and inventions could travel more freely and safely from one end of the world to another.

In a weird way, the Mongols even had a hand in events as distant as Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

As a change of pace from violent conquest, here's an account of a conflict that sought to be non-violent in its approach. 

When you read this snippet, you want to answer the question, "What was the salt march, and why is it significant in history?"

Gandhi on the Salt March

To understand this story, you need to know that in the 1920s, the British colonial government in India completely controlled the production and distribution of salt.

(Salt was worth a lot of money back in the day.)

Indians, as a result of British rule, were not allowed to make or sell salt independently.

An Indian lawyer and civil resistance leader, Mahatma Gandhi, encouraged Indians to defy the salt laws in various ways, and told the British government that he intended to lead a march on a salt depot to take the salt.

The government put Gandhi in jail, but the march on the salt depot, called Dharasana Salt Works, went ahead anyway, which is where this snippet picks up:

Dharasana Salt Works

On May 21, 1930, Gandhi's followers attempted to raid the Dharasana Salt Works. Since Gandhi had been arrested on May 5th, and he was no longer able to take part in the demonstrations.

However, under the leadership of Indian poet and political activist Sarojini Naidu, a group of 2,500 supporters walked up to the gates of the Salt Works.

However, the 2,500 non-violent protestors were met with violence from the British-hired guards who were armed with steel-tipped lathis (clubs).

Over the next two hours, the guards beat hundreds of peaceful protesters.

The attack was so brutal that it was covered by international news outlets such as The New York Times and Time Magazine.

American journalist Webb Miller was an eyewitness to the event, and he wrote about it for The New York Times:

"Not one of the marchers even raised an arm to ward off the blows. They went down like ten-pins. From where I stood I heard the sickening whacks of the clubs on unprotected skulls... An injured man lay groaning on the road, too weak to move under his own power. A woman was being helped away, her face streaming with blood from a deep gash in her forehead."

The Dharasana Salt Works raid resulted in international condemnation of the British authorities in India.

The violent response by the British only served to further Gandhi's cause and rally more support for Indian independence.

Following the overwhelming negative response to the treatment of the non-violent protestors, the British authorities eventually released Gandhi from prison in 1931.

Legacy

The legacy of the Salt March continues to this day. In India, salt is seen as a symbol of liberty, and the anniversary of the march is still celebrated every year.

The memory of Gandhi and his protest against British rule also inspired other liberation movements around the world, including Martin Luther King in the American Civil Rights movement.

The Salt March was a significant step in the Indian independence movement and helped to solidify Gandhi's reputation as a powerful political leader.

The non-violent protest also showed the world that India was united in its quest for freedom from British rule.

The memory of the march still resonates today, both in India and around the world.

The snippet about the salt march shows two types of meaning:

  • What events meant at the time they happened.
  • What event meant later, in the wider scope of history.

We don't want to make things confusing by highlighting them separately; we just want to point out the distinction.

You'll see it a lot in this lesson, and sometimes we'll highlight the "meaning at the time", and sometimes we won't.

And just as a reminder that not all historical events are caused by human agents, here's a snippet about one of the most fearsome plagues in history, the Black Death.

Can you see where this snippet explains the significance of this plague in Egypt in the 1340s?

In the mid-fourteenth century, Egypt suffered grievously from the Black Death, the pneumonic plague that tore through the Afro-Eurasian land mass.

In eighteen months, the plague killed perhaps a quarter of Egypt’s population.

An Egyptian chronicler, al-Magrizi, wrote: ‘Cairo became an empty desert, and there was no one to be seen in the streets. A man could go from the Zuwalya Gate to the Bab al-Nasr without encountering another soul. The dead were so numerous that people thought only of them.’

Ibn Khaldun, who lost his mother and father to the Black Death, believed that it threatened the very foundations of civilisation. ‘Cities and buildings were laid waste, roads and way signs were obliterated, settlements and mansions became empty, dynasties and tribes grew weak. The entire world changed.’

Egypt’s fate was worse than in many other countries. Unlike in Europe, the plague remained recurrent, breaking out twenty-eight times over the next 160 years.

In a weakened state, Egypt was vulnerable to foreign predators once more.

Again there's a mix of "at the time" and "later in history" significance.

Imagine you're a future historian writing about a major natural disaster from the mid-21st century (could be fire, flood, frost, drought, earthquake, tidal wave, volcano, solar flare...).

Use one of the snippets above for inspiration and describe:

  • Why was this event significant?
  • What effect did it have at the time?
  • What long-term impacts did it create?

What kind of language about meaning and significance did we see in these snippets?

  • The Mongol invasion of Europe left its mark...
  • The invasion is also believed to have facilitated...
  • With the lands of Asia united...
  • ...inventions could travel more freely and safely...
  • The raid resulted in...
  • Following the overwhelming negative response...
  • The legacy of the Salt March continues...
  • His protest also inspired...
  • The Salt March was a significant step...
  • ...helped to solidify Gandhi's reputation as a powerful...
  • ...believed that it threatened the very foundations of...
  • The entire world changed...
  • Egypt's fate was worse than...

The language of meaning revolves around verb groups (words that describe the cause and effect relationships) and adjective groups (words that describe good or bad, and so on).

Describe the significance of a major (imagined) natural disaster from the 21st century.

In the summer of 2053, a storm known with dark irony as Big Sandy Boi swept across the southwest of the continent, an unprecedented natural disaster that reshaped both the landscape and societal norms. This colossal sandstorm, fueled by extreme drought and climate change, engulfed cities in a choking red haze for days, reducing visibility to mere feet and halting daily life.

At the height of the storm, major urban centres became ghost towns, as residents sought refuge indoors. The storm's immediate impact was devastating: infrastructure was damaged, power grids failed, and food and water supplies were disrupted. The economic cost ran into billions, but the long-term human toll was far more profound, with tens of thousands suffering from respiratory issues and many losing their homes.